Population Action International

Chapter Four: Transitional Age Structures

Until the early 1970s, when the population reached 54 million (up from 20 million in 1940) and the average woman had 6.5 children, Mexico's population policies were traditionally pro-natalist. Change occurred when the National Family Planning Program was created in 1972 followed by the National Population Council in 1974. By the latter half of the 1970s, family planning began to gain widespread acceptance with an estimated 42 percent of Mexican women of childbearing age using contraceptive methods.

Through the National Family Planning Program, states provided free family planning services and information as mandated under the general population law of 1974. This increased availability of health services led to a rapid decline in fertility and is today viewed as one of the most successful family planning programs. The strength and success of the family planning program and the fact that per capita income rose above $5,000 in 1990 led the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) to withdraw support for contraceptives beginning in 1992.5 After the International Conference on Population and Development in 1994, Mexico was one of the first countries (and the first in Latin America) to replace population-control strategies with rights-based policies and programs.6

Figure 4.6
Mexico's Position Along the Demographic Transition

Mexico progressed along the demographic transition in a fairly typical way, beginning with falling death rates in the 1930s, followed by a period of rapid growth. Between 1955 and 1975, the population growth rate exceeded three percent annually. The 1970s saw the beginning of fertility decline and major reform of population policy.

Figure 4.7
Current Demographic Statistics for Mexico7


Population 1980 68 million
Population 2005 107 million
Population 2025 (medium fertility projection) 129 million
Population 2050 (medium fertility projection) 139 million
Median population age 25 years
Population under age 15 31% Total fertility rate (2005-2010) 2.15
Contraceptive prevalence rate (modern methods, 1997) 56%
Unmet need for family planning no data
Life expectancy 74 years male, 79 years female
HIV prevalence rate (ages 15-49, 2005) 0.3%
GNI per capita (Atlas method, current US$, 2005) $7,310
Population living below poverty line 20%
Unemployment rate (2004) 3%
Adult literacy rate (2004) 90% female, 92% male
Arable land (% of total, 2003) 13

The recent emergence of a democratic government in Mexico has had profound effects on the health system, ushering in radical health reforms. After more than 70 years of dominance, the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) was defeated by the center-right PAN (the National Action Party) party. Vicente Fox succeeded PRI president Ernesto Zedillo in the 2000 presidential election, Mexico's first truly democratic election in a century.8 The 2006 election, after very close balloting, led Felipe Calder—n, the PAN candidate, to be declared the winner by the electoral tribunal.

Overwhelmed by the double burden of disease and facing stark inequalities in access to health care, the new democratic era empowered the people and government to embrace a rights-based health agenda. Although social insurance has been offered in Mexico for more than 50 years, it was limited in scope and left the majority of the population vulnerable to impoverishment in the face of poor health. About half of the population lacked health insurance, and the poorest paid the most for health services. Research showed that catastrophic health care costs were impoverishing families, creating a cycle of poverty that crossed generations. Mexico faced a paradox: While good health care was needed to combat poverty, the high costs of health care services were contributing to that impoverishment.9

The period from 2000 through 2006 has been quite remarkable for Mexico. The change in regime from near dictatorship to democracy in 2000 led to radical health systems reforms. A cornerstone of these reforms is the Seguro Popular program, an extension and outgrowth of the Oportunidades program. Oportunidades is Mexico's national health, nutrition and education program designed to interrupt the intergenerational transmission of poverty. Started in 1997, the strategy is based on cash transfers to female heads of household predicated on the performance of responsibilities including sending children to school, nutritional supplementation, clinic attendance and the use of preventive health measures such as reproductive health services.10 While successful, Oportunidades could not keep up with the emerging double burden of disease, requiring a new and expanded program. Initiated in 2004, Seguro Popular aims to realize national universal health insurance by 2010.11  Mexico's health care reform efforts combine a strong analytical foundation with the creation of a social movement for change. The reforms are being watched closely by international partners as a test case for how radical and well-planned health reform can help mitigate the effects of difficult development, demographic and epidemiologic transitions. With substantial investment in research, evaluation and advocacy, interest in the program's successes is high, as evidenced by a recent series in The Lancet.12 However, the reforms are still being fully implemented, and the administrations of the ruling PAN party have given voice to more socially conservative views. Abortion remains illegal (with a few exceptions), and gender inequality and violence against women remain major challenges for Mexico.

Figure 4.8
Mexico's Potential Age Structures, 2025



Under the UN's high-fertility scenario for 2025–in which Mexico's fertility rate would rise from its current level of 2.15 to 2.4 children per woman–the country would remain in the transitional structure category. However, unless the government pursues an actively pro-natalist policy or there is a general collapse of the health care system and family planning program, an increase in fertility rates is unlikely. In contrast, under the UN's low-fertility projection, fertility rates would decline to 1.4 children per woman, pushing Mexico into the mature age structure category. Perhaps more likely is the medium-fertility variant between these two extremes, which assumes a decline in fertility rates to 1.9 and the population's continued progression through the transitional structure category.


<< 1 | 2 | 3 | >>

Notes

  1. Williamson, J. 2001. "Demographic Change, Economic Growth, and Inequality" in Birdsall, N., A. Kelley and S. Sinding (eds). Population Matters: Demographic Change, Economic Growth, and Poverty in the Developing World. Oxford: Oxford University Press; Population Action International (PAI). 2006. "How Shifts to Smaller Family Sizes Contributed to the Asian Miracle" Washington, DC: PAI.
    .
  2. World Bank. 2006. World Development Report 2007: Development and the Next Generation. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  3. World Bank. 2004. World Development Indicators 2005. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  4. Gonzalez-Pier, E. et al. 2006. "Priority Setting for Health Interventions in Mexico's System of Social Protection in Health" The Lancet 368:9547, 4 November.
  5. Alkenbrack, S., and C. Shepherd. 2005. Lessons Learned from Phaseout of Donor Support in a National Family Planning Program. Washington, DC: POLICY Project.
  6. Smith, W. A. 2006. A Common Border, A Shared Goal. Lessons and Inspiration from MEXICO for Advancing Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights. Washington, DC: Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS).
  7. UN Development Programme. 2006. Human Development Report 2006. New York: UN Development Programme; UN Population Division. 2005. World Population Prospects: The 2004 Revision. New York: UN Population Division; UN Population Division. 2006. World Contraceptive Use 2005. New York: UN Population Division; World Bank. 2006. World Development Indicators 2006. Washington, DC: World Bank; Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). 2006. The World Factbook 2006. Washington, DC: CIA.
  8. Krauze, E. 2006. "Furthering Democracy in Mexico" Foreign Affairs 85:1.
  9. Frenk, J. et. al. 2006. "Comprehensive Reform to Improve Health System Performance in Mexico" The Lancet 368:9546, 28 October; Frenk, J. 2006. "Bridging the Divide: Global Lessons from Evidence-Based Health Policy in Mexico" The Lancet 368, 9 September.
  10. Frenk, J. 2006. Health Financing Task Force Panel. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution. 24 July.
  11. Frenk, J. and R. Horton. 2006. "Evidence for Health-System Reform: A Call to Action" The Lancet 368:9529, 1 July.
  12. Frenk, J. et. al. 2006. "Comprehensive Reform to Improve Health System Performance in Mexico" The Lancet 368:9546, 28 October; Frenk, J. 2006. "Bridging the Divide: Global Lessons from Evidence-Based Health Policy in Mexico" The Lancet 368, 9 September.
  13. UN Population Division. 2005. World Population Prospects: The 2004 Revision. New York: UN Population Division.
  14. UN Population Division. 2006. World Contraceptive Use 2005. New York: UN Population Division; MEASURE DHS. "Country Summary: Tunisia" Available online here; last accessed 21 September 2006.
  15. Naik, G. 2003. "Women and Economy Gain with Lower Rate of Birth" Wall Street Journal, 8 August.
  16. Ibid.; United Nations Development Programme. 2005. Human Development Report 2005. New York: United Nations Development Program.
  17. UN Development Programme. 2006. Human Development Report 2006. New York: UN Development Programme; UN Population Division. 2005. World Population Prospects: The 2004 Revision. New York: UN Population Division; UN Population Division. 2006. World Contraceptive Use 2005. New York: UN Population Division; World Bank. 2006. World Development Indicators 2006. Washington, DC: World Bank; Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). 2006. The World Factbook 2006. Washington, DC: CIA